Executive Summary
The weaponization of weaponization is the giveaway phrase of this entire era — the same institutions that captured our courts, our schools, and our elections are now writing the official story of who weaponized them. This week alone the receipts arrived in stacks. A reported $1.7 billion "weaponization fund" appeared inside a lawsuit where the same party sits as both plaintiff and defendant — Article III of the Constitution does not allow that — and over 90 members of Congress had to rush into court to stop it. A 64-year-old Marina Del Rey woman pleaded guilty to a 20-year scheme of paying homeless people $2 and $3 to register to vote, with at least 28 cash exchanges personally filmed in Los Angeles alone. Maryland was caught sending out 500,000 illegal mail-in ballots and is sending 500,000 more — no public accounting of the first batch. A judge in Georgia, who happens to be Stacey Abrams' sister, sealed the misconduct record of a State Supreme Court candidate before voters can see it. The Colorado Supreme Court invoked an 1868 Confederate-officer disqualification clause that does not even apply to the presidency to attempt to remove a candidate who has never been convicted of insurrection by any court. The Obama Foundation publicly launched its own "young global leaders" program in coordination with the World Economic Forum, the University of Chicago, and Agenda 2030 — the fundamental transformation is on letterhead. And the great Yuri Bezmenov's four stages of subversion — demoralization, destabilization, crisis, normalization — are not theory anymore. They are this week's news cycle. We the People are still the answer, and the work is local. Scroll to the bottom for Key Takeaways.
A $1.7 Billion "Weaponization Fund" — And Why Article III Forbids It
The lawsuit was supposed to be the remedy. Instead, the lawsuit became the loot.
A reported $1.7 billion fund was attached this week to a settlement in which the same party is both plaintiff and defendant — a structure the Constitution explicitly does not allow. As one observer put it on air, "He can't be both the plaintiff and the defendant in a case. The Constitution doesn't allow that. It's not a real controversy if you're on both sides of it." That is correct as a matter of black-letter law. Over 90 members of Congress had to file an emergency motion saying, "Stop, thief. Do not dismiss the case. Do not pass go. Do not collect $1.7 billion for a fund for so-called weaponization for your cronies."
This is what the weaponization of weaponization looks like in real time. The cure becomes the disease. The settlement becomes the payoff. The accountability machinery gets rerouted into a slush fund. We the People are supposed to be too tired to notice. But the receipts are right there.
Ballots, Ballots, Ballots — The Real Election Story This Week
The ballots are the issue. The ballot counting is the issue.
Brenda Lee Brown Armstrong of Marina Del Rey, age 64, pleaded guilty to a federal felony for paying another person to register to vote. The scheme ran for twenty years. She handed cash — two dollars, three dollars — to people on Skid Row to sign petitions and to register, letting them use her home address so the mail-in ballots would come right back to her. Investigators personally witnessed and covertly filmed at least 28 cash exchanges in Los Angeles alone. That is the documented surface of a single county.
Now extend the pattern. In Maryland — a state already caught sending out 500,000 illegal mail-in ballots — officials are authorizing another 500,000 with no public accounting of what happened to the first batch. That is one million mail-in ballots in a single state in a single cycle. In Georgia, GOP candidates had to file an emergency restraining order against Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger because his office is not allowing Republican poll watchers and state election board observers inside what the candidates literally called "the bunker" — the room where the statewide results are tabulated and published. Raffensperger has mocked them in public.
This is not a legitimate process. This is a process that refuses transparency. And a process that refuses transparency is telling you something about itself.
January 6th — The Talking Point Was the Operation
January 6th was not a Trump-led insurrection.
The crowd had no guns. There was no plan to overthrow the government. President Trump was miles from the building at the White House, issuing a public statement calling for calm and non-violence. And yet within minutes of the Capitol breach, every network was reading from the same script — insurrection, insurrection, insurrection — before any evidence, before any investigation. As the on-air commentary observed: "This was, of course, a lie, but it was also a very obvious lie. So clearly we were watching the rollout of a talking point, words crafted for a specific purpose."
Two minutes after the breach, Speaker Nancy Pelosi suspended all normal procedures and pushed an expedited emergency certification — denying standing to the ten members of Congress preparing to raise constitutional objections. Those same ten members were then targeted and spied on by Jack Smith's office, under the signatures of Chris Wray, Lisa Monaco, and Merrick Garland. Men dressed as Trump supporters were filmed inside the Capitol walking past police lines that were not engaging with them. When asked under oath whether the FBI had confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol prior to the doors being opened, the FBI director answered: "Again, I have to be very careful in what I —." That is not a no.
Even the Colorado Supreme Court got into the act. Four liberal justices invoked Article 3 of the 14th Amendment — written in 1868 to keep former Confederate officials out of office, and a section that on its plain text does not apply to the presidency — to disqualify a candidate from the state ballot. The candidate has never been convicted of insurrection by any court. That was the sum total of the reasoning. That is not law. That is lawfare.
Bezmenov's Four Stages Are Not Theory — They Are This Week
Yuri Bezmenov sat with G. Edward Griffin and described the four stages of subversion in plain English: demoralization, destabilization, crisis, normalization. He told us how a country falls without ever being invaded — through its schools, its psychology departments, its newspapers, its courts.
After the first World War the dumbing-down of America began. After the 1960s it accelerated. The Students for a Democratic Society — the Weather Underground, the real domestic terrorists who bombed the Capitol and robbed Brinks trucks — were largely absorbed into our elite institutions instead of being held to account. Bill Ayers. Bernardine Dohrn. The mentors of the politicians who now govern us. They became tenured professors of psychology, education, and law. They turned critical race theory and Marxism and outright communism into respectable curriculum, and they trained generations of children — our children — to believe socialism is moral and the Republic is shameful.
That is the infiltration. That is how it moves.
The Obama Foundation, the WEF, and Agenda 2030 — On Letterhead
There is no longer any need to speculate about what comes next.
The Obama Foundation has publicly announced its own "young global leaders" program. It is described as running in tandem with the World Economic Forum's Young Global Leaders. It is structured through the University of Chicago and the Obama Foundation Scholars Program. Its stated mission is to advance the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and Agenda 2030 around the world. The end of the nation-state. The end of borders. The end of a common culture. The end of the Republican form of government.
This is not a conspiracy. This is on the press release. Meanwhile, in every blue city, the Democrat Socialists, the People's Forum, and the public-sector unions are organizing what they themselves are calling Summer of Love 2.0 — rallies and riots against the President our country actually elected. Kamala Harris wants to abolish the Electoral College, pack the Supreme Court, and admit DC and Puerto Rico as states. Jayapal wants the Court "reformed." Mamdani says government is the answer. A self-described communist mayor in Seattle says it is "nice to feel seen" when the President names her.
They are telling us who they are. We the People are obligated to believe them.
The Question Is Where Our Rights Come From
This week MSNBC asked, on camera, whether House Speaker Mike Johnson is "putting God above the Declaration of Independence." Open the document. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness." That is the founding sentence of the country. The entire architecture of American liberty rests on the claim that the source of our rights is higher than government and therefore cannot be taken by government. Strip out the Creator and the rights become privileges issued by whoever happens to be in power.
That is not a theological debate. That is the entire ballgame.
These rights were not born in 1776 alone. They were born in the meadows of Runnymede with the Magna Carta. They were born in the English common law that placed even the king beneath the law. They were born in the covenant faith of the Scottish people. They were carried here. They were codified here. And this week millions of British citizens flooded London asking for their country back — and the American press, in the main, refused to cover it. That silence was editorial. The suppliers of conflict and chaos cannot afford the contagion of a Western awakening.
Recovery Is Local — Here Is What We Do This Week
The crisis stage is loud on purpose. The suppliers want us reaching for the bourbon, the doom-scroll, the screaming match with a stranger online. The recovery work is the opposite of all of that. Knowledge breeds confidence. Confidence breeds calm. Calm makes the next constructive step possible. We the People are the answer. We always were.
Find out exactly how ballots are handled in your county. Read the Declaration of Independence out loud with your family this week. Pick one local meeting — school board, county commission, election board, city council — and show up in person. Not online. In the room. That is the room the suppliers, dealers, and consumers of conflict and chaos do not want us in. That is the room where the Republic is still being kept.
Key Takeaways
- A reported $1.7 billion "weaponization fund" was attached to a settlement where the same party sits as both plaintiff and defendant — Article III of the Constitution forbids it, and 90+ members of Congress are in court to stop it.
- A 20-year ballot-fraud scheme in Los Angeles ended this week with Brenda Lee Brown Armstrong's federal guilty plea — at least 28 cash exchanges with homeless registrants were personally witnessed and filmed.
- Maryland was caught sending 500,000 illegal mail-in ballots and is now sending another 500,000 with no public accounting of the first batch.
- A Georgia judge — Stacey Abrams' sister — sealed the misconduct record of State Supreme Court candidate Jen Jordan before the vote; Fani Willis grand jury transcripts only became public after a GOP defendant filed a motion.
- The Colorado Supreme Court tried to invoke Article 3 of the 14th Amendment — an 1868 Confederate-officer clause that does not apply to the presidency — against a candidate never convicted of insurrection.
- The Obama Foundation has publicly launched its own "young global leaders" program in coordination with the World Economic Forum, the University of Chicago, and Agenda 2030.
- Yuri Bezmenov's four stages of subversion — demoralization, destabilization, crisis, normalization — are not theory; they are this week's news cycle.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is a $1.7 billion settlement unconstitutional if both sides agreed to it?
Because Article III of the Constitution requires an actual case or controversy — two genuinely opposing parties. When the same party effectively sits as both plaintiff and defendant, there is no real adversarial proceeding, which is why over 90 members of Congress have intervened to stop the disbursement. A "settlement" that quietly creates a $1.7 billion fund for political allies is not a remedy. It is a transfer.
Is mail-in ballot fraud actually a real, documented thing — or just a talking point?
It is documented this week in a federal guilty plea — Brenda Lee Brown Armstrong of Marina Del Rey, 20-year scheme, at least 28 filmed cash exchanges in Los Angeles alone. It is documented in Maryland's 500,000 illegal mail-in ballots. It is documented in Georgia's refusal to let GOP poll watchers into the room where votes are tabulated. The pattern is national. The receipts keep coming.
If January 6th was not an insurrection, why have so many people been charged for it?
That is precisely the question. The crowd had no guns. President Trump was at the White House calling for calm. The FBI director cannot tell Congress whether confidential human sources were dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol before the doors opened. The Colorado Supreme Court is invoking a 14th Amendment clause that does not apply to the presidency. The pattern is the prosecution preceding the evidence — that is lawfare, and the cover-ups since are arguably the bigger crime.
What is Agenda 2030 in plain English, and why is the Obama Foundation connected to it?
Agenda 2030 is the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals framework — a global governance roadmap that subordinates national sovereignty, borders, energy, food, finance, and education to internationally-set targets. The Obama Foundation has publicly announced a "young global leaders" program running in tandem with the World Economic Forum and the University of Chicago to push exactly this agenda. It is not hidden. It is on the press release.
What is one realistic thing I can do this week that actually moves the needle?
Pick one public local meeting — school board, county commission, election board, city council — and show up in person. Not online. In the room. The suppliers of conflict and chaos count on our absence from those rooms. Your physical presence at one civic meeting this week will do more for the Republic than a thousand arguments online.
Watch the full episode on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v7a2u88-mornings-with-mel-k-the-weaponization-of-weaponization-5-19-26.html
For my readers – Yes, we used AI to turn this episode into something readable for you. My team reviews everything first and does their best to sound like me. If it doesn't, that's fair, the robots aren't perfect…yet. If you want the real thing – unscripted, unfiltered, and exactly how I said it – that's what the full episode is for. You can always find it here [https://rumble.com/v7a2u88-mornings-with-mel-k-the-weaponization-of-weaponization-5-19-26.html]