Executive Summary
Some days the receipts land faster than anyone can process them, and this was one of those days. The handwritten notes of Peter Strzok and others were released, and they do not read like a counterintelligence file. They read like a plan. The notes ask the goal out loud: do we want to catch him, do we want to make him lie? The target was General Michael Flynn. The setup is no longer an argument. It is a document.
At the same time, two federal investigative tracks are running simultaneously in the Southern District of Florida. One is examining the coordinated campaign against Donald Trump and the movement behind him — that is the track looking at former FBI Director James Comey. The other is examining whether former CIA Director John Brennan made materially false statements to Congress about the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment. Roughly one hundred subpoenas have reportedly gone out. Comey has been subpoenaed. So has the professor he leaked through. There has been no public indictment returned since August 12, 2026.
Then there is the money — and the money is always the story beneath the story. The United Nations was caught covering up that its own personnel were on the ground in the October 7th attack on Israel, while asking us for more funding. The international banking bodies tied to that postwar order have carried immunity since 1945 and cannot be audited. In 2005 the Department of Defense put $200 million into 46 Ukrainian laboratories and health facilities. In 2015, USAID and UK Aid funded the platform that became Ukraine's digital ID — Ukraine's own ministry said USAID covered about 80% of what they needed. And north of us, almost unwatched, Canada signed a civil nuclear and uranium track with China in Beijing in January 2026.
Four stories. One architecture. Let's walk it.
Scroll to the bottom for Key Takeaways.
The Flynn Notes and the Two Grand Juries: Why This Week Is Different
For years we were told the case against General Flynn was routine. The handwritten notes settle that.
What's our goal? Do we want to catch him, make him lie? Those are the words. That is not how you open an investigation — that is how you select an outcome and then work backward toward it.
What makes this moment different from every previous round of revelations is that the paper is now attached to process. Two grand juries. Roughly a hundred subpoenas. Comey subpoenaed. The professor he used as a conduit subpoenaed. And the trail from that professor leads onward to the reporter's household at the New York Times that printed the leaked material.
Here is what still stings — and what should motivate rather than demoralize us. Every one of the New York Times Russia-hoax reporters kept their Pulitzer prizes. They are still writing books. The books are still selling. Nobody has given anything back.
Meanwhile, look at Comey's own sworn testimony. Asked whether he had ever been an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump or Clinton investigations, he said: never. Asked whether he authorized anyone else at the FBI to do it, he said no. Asked whether classified information about Trump had been shared with the media, he said not to his knowledge.
Now set that against the 2017 leak investigation. FBI General Counsel James Baker disclosed that classified US government information went to the New York Times — and testified he believed he was ultimately instructed and authorized to do it by Director Comey, with the FBI chief of staff conveying the instruction. The Durham memo recommended no prosecution of Baker. Or of anyone else.
A disclosure occurred. An author was named. Nothing followed. That is not a leak — that is a practice.
The Clinton Email Record, Line by Line
The same assertion-versus-record pattern runs through the Clinton emails, and the numbers there are exact.
She said nothing she sent or received was marked classified — the FBI determined 110 emails across 52 email chains contained classified information at the time they were sent or received. She said one device, for convenience; she used multiple across four years as Secretary of State. She said all 55,000 pages of work-related email went back to the State Department; work-related emails were later found that had not been returned.
Three claims. Three contradictions. Established years ago — and for years, nothing moved.
Follow the Money: NATO, the UN, and the Banks Nobody Can Audit
Now the part I want every American to sit with, because it is the part that never makes the evening news.
The UN was caught covering up that its own personnel were on the ground in the October 7th attack on Israel — and that same institution is asking for more money. The international banking bodies bound up in the postwar order have held immunity since 1945. They cannot be audited, by Congress or by you.
Trillions of dollars have moved through that architecture since World War II. Ask the plain question: what kind of arrangement grants permanent immunity and permanent secrecy to the handlers of other people's money?
This did not begin last year. When the Dulles brothers walked into the State Department and the CIA in 1953, the direction of American foreign policy changed. From there, State, the intelligence services, the National Endowment for Democracy — soft power by another name — and eventually USAID all began functioning as a tentacle of the international banking cartel. Endless war for profit. Regime change. The steady push toward global governance and the end of nation states.
That is why I keep saying we should demand we pull out of NATO. Until NATO ends, there will always be another reason for NATO to go to war — the real money arrives in the reconstruction, exactly as it is arriving in Ukraine now. And at home, Treasury has cited roughly $600 billion in US taxpayer fraud per year, while only about 47% of us pay federal income taxes at all. That is the pool being drained, and it belongs to working Americans who never got a vote on any of it.
The Ukraine Laboratory: $200 Million, 46 Labs, and a Digital ID
Here is the ledger, plainly.
In 2005, Ukraine agreed to the Defense Threat Reduction Biological Security Program. The Department of Defense put in $200 million at the time — money that built 46 Ukrainian laboratories, health facilities, and diagnostic sites. Obama was involved with Senator Lugar in opening the first such lab in Georgia.
In 2015, USAID and UK Aid funded the platform behind Ukraine's digital ministry. Ukraine's own people said USAID supported roughly 80% of the money needed to launch their digital ID system. Sixty million American taxpayer dollars went for cybersecurity. Another $650,000 designed the digital identity model itself.
General David Petraeus called Ukraine "the defining military laboratory of the 21st century," and said future historians will study it the way earlier generations studied the American Civil War. A laboratory. Digital public infrastructure, digital ID, crypto, automated weapons, drones. Angela Merkel has said outright that they were arming Ukraine for a later war.
And the people who live there? Ukraine's prosecutor general resigned over a criminal corruption probe touching his own office — roughly the fifteenth senior official out that door. The prime minister resigned weeks earlier, also under investigation. The defense minister went before that, citing procurement and corruption. Men in their fifties and sixties are handcuffed off the street and put on buses to the front lines.
George Soros never had to be investigated on this point. He said it himself: he set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of Russia, and it has been functioning ever since, playing an important part in events. His words, his interview.
There is reason to hope, too. American negotiators traveled to both Moscow and Kyiv, Russia signaled it wants to normalize relations, and both sides agreed to a three-day no-shoot window so talks could happen. We should all be praying this needless, endless war actually ends.
Canada, China, and the Technocracy Nobody Voted For
This is the story almost no American is tracking, and it is on our northern border.
Mark Carney's government opened a 49,000-vehicle annual quota for Chinese electric vehicles — surveillance on wheels. The trade minister met with the three largest Chinese EV manufacturers about bringing them in, and Canada has voiced support for the Belt and Road Initiative.
In January 2026, Energy Minister Tim Hodgson was in Beijing with Carney signing an energy track with China's National Energy Administration — policy coordination, information exchange, conventional and clean energy, civil nuclear and uranium. Shortly after, the Bank of Canada and the Bank of China extended their bilateral currency swap. A House of Commons committee found major public pension managers with roughly two to ten percent exposure to Chinese state-linked holdings, and one manager told Parliament the figure was 9.8% — with documented positions in Alibaba, Tencent, and China-linked indices. Steel has also been arriving from overseas into Canada, repackaged, and sent into America to avoid being taxed.
This is the same Mark Carney who came out of the Bank of England, wants nature converted into an asset class he helps govern, and is fully committed to Agenda 2030 and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals. What sits at the top of that agenda? Technocracy. What is China right now? A technocracy. Full track-and-trace surveillance run by experts — dictatorship by bureaucracy.
The Constitution Is the Real Target — And We Are the Real Answer
Strip away the individual stories and one target remains.
At a socialist conference in 2026, a Columbia professor, a Georgetown law professor, and a UC Santa Barbara professor shared a stage arguing for ending the Electoral College, the Senate, and the Constitution — because a constitutional republic means the people have a voice and a vote. At Harvard, at an event built around resisting populism, a professor said plainly that elite pushback was crucial to keeping certain things from happening during the first Trump term. Nobody leaked either statement. They were delivered from podiums.
The mechanism they need is arithmetic. Operatives like Mark Elias and Norm Eisen, backed by the 1630 network and Protect Democracy, want as many ballots as possible — while voter ID, citizenship verification, postal chain of custody, and hand counting are all resisted. The destination is what John Podesta's own Center for American Progress calls majoritarian democracy: 51% ruling the 49%. Podesta is also one of the writers of Agenda 2030, the framework for ending the nation state in favor of governance by regionalization, published on the UN's own website. The AutoPen that day, it appears, was signed by Neera Tanden — president of that same Center for American Progress.
None of this arrived by accident. Gloria Steinem confirmed her 1967 role as a CIA operative to the New York Times, calling the agency liberal, nonviolent, and honorable. Roughly 80% of the Students for a Democratic Society went into academia for life. The Frankfurt School landed at Columbia. Cloward and Piven wrote their strategy at Columbia. Today only 8% of Americans say our schools prepare children for the future, with K-12 satisfaction at 32% — a 27-year low.
So here is the pivot, and I mean it with everything I have. We are still a constitutional republic. Our inalienable rights come from God, not from government — and that single sentence is the obstacle every structure described here was built to route around. A right that government did not grant is a right government cannot revoke.
We the People are the answer. Not a party. Not an institution. Not a savior in Washington. You have far more power than you think — but only as long as the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the constitutional republic stand. This time it is not the British are coming. The enemy is within, in your own backyard. So inform yourself, be the Paul Revere of your own community, and be the hero of your own story. Get involved locally, now — because the other side already is.
Key Takeaways
- Handwritten notes from Peter Strzok and others ask "do we want to catch him, make him lie?" about General Michael Flynn — the setup is now documented.
- Two grand juries are running at once in the Southern District of Florida; roughly 100 subpoenas are out and no public indictment has been returned since August 12, 2026.
- FBI General Counsel James Baker testified he leaked classified material to the New York Times believing Comey authorized it — the Durham memo recommended no prosecution.
- The FBI found 110 emails in 52 chains containing classified information at the time they were sent or received, contradicting every public claim made about them.
- The UN covered up that its own personnel were on the ground on October 7th while seeking more funding it has been immune from auditing since 1945.
- In 2005 the DoD put $200 million into 46 Ukrainian labs; in 2015 USAID covered roughly 80% of the funding behind Ukraine's digital ID platform.
- Carney's Canada opened a 49,000-vehicle Chinese EV quota and signed a civil nuclear and uranium track with China in Beijing in January 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
If the Flynn notes are this explicit, why hasn't anyone been charged?
Because for years the people who would have brought charges were the people under scrutiny — and the Durham memo recommended no prosecution of Baker or anyone else over the classified leak. What has changed is that two grand juries are now running simultaneously and subpoenas are going out by the hundred. The last public indictment was August 12, 2026. Watching closely and demanding accountability publicly is the job right now.
Why study NATO's history instead of just arguing about its budget?
Because the budget is downstream of the design. NATO belongs to the same postwar decade that produced the banking bodies immune from audit since 1945 and the apparatus the Dulles brothers took over in 1953. The profits come in the reconstruction — exactly what we are watching in Ukraine.
Is Canada actually a US national security problem?
Look at what was signed. A 49,000-vehicle annual quota for Chinese EVs that function as surveillance platforms. A Beijing energy agreement in January 2026 covering civil nuclear and uranium. A Bank of Canada–Bank of China currency swap. Parliamentary testimony putting one pension manager's Chinese state-linked exposure at 9.8%.
What can one person realistically do about a global architecture?
Read the primary documents instead of the commentary — Agenda 2030 is public on the UN's own site. Show up to the school board or county commission meeting, where outcomes turn on a dozen people. Ask the audit question in writing of every office that spends your money. Knowledge breeds confidence, confidence leads to calm, and calm people build things that last.
Watch the full episode on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v7fagko-a-republic-worth-protecting-in-the-crosshairs-9-9-26.html
For my readers – Yes, we used AI to turn this episode into something readable for you. My team reviews everything first and does their best to sound like me. If it doesn't, that's fair, the robots aren't perfect…yet. If you want the real thing – unscripted, unfiltered, and exactly how I said it – that's what the full episode is for. You can always find it here [https://rumble.com/v7fagko-a-republic-worth-protecting-in-the-crosshairs-9-9-26.html]