Executive Summary
I went back to 2020 on today's show, because we have all forgotten how we got here — and because the people who built this are not finished. We opened with the montage everyone has seen and nobody has really sat with. Prime ministers, presidents, network anchors, and a royal, all saying the same three words in the same order inside the same handful of months. Build back better. A phrase does not synchronize itself across five continents in one season. Somebody sends it.
So we traced it backward. The earliest document I can put my hands on is a George Soros paper dated November 1, 1993 — Toward a New World Order: The Future of NATO — which became Bill Clinton and John Podesta's foreign policy. Podesta went on to be one of the original writers of Agenda 2030. In September 2015 Soros published a six-point migration plan in Project Syndicate, and Viktor Orbán read it back point by point on the record. Within a month of that piece, Obama, Samantha Power, Susan Rice, Antony Blinken, Jake Sullivan, and Podesta signed the United States onto Agenda 2030 — a governance model that ends nation states.
Then January 2020. On the 23rd, Soros stands at Davos, calls nationalism the great enemy of open society, names Trump and Xi as the obstacles, and announces a billion dollars for a new university network. Harari, Merkel, Trudeau, von der Leyen, Guterres, Prince Charles, and Klaus Schwab fill out the stage. One president stands against the whole room. Within a month, COVID was here — and behind all of it, Harvard had quietly built a military-style election operation nobody voted for.
Scroll to the bottom for Key Takeaways.
The Memo Came First: A 1993 Paper That Became Policy
I do not tell you what to think. I tell you where to look — and this is where to look.
George Soros wrote Toward a New World Order: The Future of NATO on November 1, 1993. Its opening line announces that the world order that prevailed since the Second World War has come to an end. The old arrangement is finished, he is saying, and a new one is already being drafted.
That paper became the foreign policy of the Clinton administration, carried by John Podesta. Hillary Clinton herself said on stage that the Council on Foreign Relations ran that administration's foreign policy.
Then came 2015. Soros published a six-point plan in Project Syndicate that September. Viktor Orbán read it back on the record — the European Union must accept at least one million asylum seekers annually, financing is critical so issue long-term eurobonds, and establish safe channels moving people from Greece and Italy onward into destination countries, routed through Hungary.
Orbán's summary is the line I keep returning to. It was written. It was published. It is known.
Within a month of that piece, the United States signed onto Agenda 2030 — not an environmental program but a governance architecture. Global climate authority. Global pandemic authority. Global law. The International Criminal Court. Central bank digital currency. Every element operates above the nation state by design.
Davos 2020: They Announced It From the Podium
Here is the part nobody remembers, and it was never hidden.
On January 23, 2020, George Soros spoke at the World Economic Forum while Donald Trump was the sitting president. Nationalism, "the great enemy of open society," had gained ground since Trump's election, he said. He named Trump. He named Xi. He said that taking the climate emergency and worldwide unrest into account, 2020 and the next few years would determine not only the fate of Xi and Trump, but the fate of the world.
Then he announced what he called the most important project of his life — the Open Society University Network, backed by one billion dollars. By that point he was operating through roughly 1,100 funded NGOs, braided together with Rockefeller, Ford, MacArthur, Tides, Arabella, Bloomberg, Gates, and the Clintons.
One billion dollars announced ten months before an election is not philanthropy. It is a deployment.
Yuval Noah Harari spoke the next day and defended the rules-based liberal global order. Angela Merkel called for multilateralism — before she opened Europe's borders. António Guterres criticized nation states for being selfish. Johnson, Trudeau, Ardern, von der Leyen, Georgieva, Prince Charles, and Klaus Schwab filled out the lineup.
One man stood against the entire room. He called them the perennial prophets of doom and said that having made our country great again, we would help every nation take back its sovereignty. That was the moment the battle began.
Within a month of that meeting, COVID was in America and worldwide — and Larry Fink of BlackRock moved to the center of Agenda 2030 and the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which Klaus Schwab described as a change that would not alter humanity but meld humans and machines.
Harvard's D3P: A Battle Staff for an American Election
Now the piece almost nobody outside this audience has heard.
After 2016, the Harvard Belfer Center created Defending Digital Democracy — D3P. Eric Rosenbach led it; he had been chief of staff to Defense Secretary Ash Carter. Robby Mook co-led it; he had co-run Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign with John Podesta. Mary McCord, who runs Georgetown's constitutional program, was a partner — and her husband, Sheldon Snook, was chief of staff to Chief Justice John Roberts.
Read the partner list and decide for yourself whether it sounds like a civics seminar. Harvard Kennedy School. Belfer Center. Institute of Politics. Shorenstein Center. Google. Facebook. Microsoft. CrowdStrike. Brunswick Group. Citibank. Albright Capital. The International Republican Institute. The National Democratic Institute. Perkins Coie. Jones Day. NSA. DHS. CISA under Chris Krebs — inside the Trump administration. Plus secretaries of state and local election administrators.
The operational record is the part that should stop you cold. Simulations in 25 states, at the county and local level, before the 2020 election. Exercises in another 44 states. Nine hundred election officials trained and engaged during the 2020 cycle. A military-style playbook and battle staff model — election operation centers, common operating pictures, incident logs, reporting chains, battle rhythms, escalation procedures — with narrative monitoring and coordinated public response folded in alongside cybersecurity.
The funding figure I have for D3P is $350 million, separate from the roughly $300 million Mark Zuckerberg routed to the Center for Tech and Civic Life.
Let me be fair to the official framing, because it deserves a hearing. Local election offices genuinely were under-resourced. Foreign interference genuinely was a live concern. Hardening the system sounds responsible on its face.
But grant all of that and look at what the structure produced anyway. The losing campaign's manager helped write the doctrine. The platforms that determine national reach sat at the table. "Narrative monitoring" means someone decided which narratives required monitoring. And because the whole thing was privately funded, no voter can audit it and no subpoena reaches it. When the weaponization hearings finally came, they went nowhere.
No Kings, the 3.5 Percent, and the 2026 Build-Out
Mary McCord gave an interview to NBC News in April of 2024 — before the election. She said the group had already gathered. Norm Eisen has described the same meeting. People out of the Transition Integrity Project sat down and gamed out every way they would undermine a second Trump term if he won. No Kings came out of that. It did not begin when he took office. It began at Harvard.
Indivisible, which leads it, is funded by Soros, Arabella — now calling itself Sunflower — Tides, Rockefeller, MacArthur, and Ford.
Listen to how they talk when they think only their own people are listening. On a recent call, an Indivisible leader referred to "the anti-election sabotage work that we very well may need to do on November 4th or possibly beyond." That same call walked through Erica Chenoweth's Harvard finding that no dictator has survived sustained mobilization by 3.5 percent of a population — with the careful caveat that the number is not about one protest day. It is, in their words, about "the ongoing ability of a mobilized, meaningful portion of the population to do things."
The metric was never the goal. The standing capacity is the goal.
Meanwhile a Senate Election Protection Task Force has been announced — eleven senators, lawyers, observers, rapid response teams, already in place in key battlegrounds and high-risk jurisdictions. The named experts are Marc Elias, Eric Holder, Vanita Gupta, Norm Eisen, and Sky Perryman. The same names from 2016. The same names from 2020. The same names now.
Lawfare: When the Process Becomes the Punishment
Lawfare is warfare conducted through the legal system, and it was formalized at the Harvard Kennedy School. Its definition is the use of law to destroy an opponent in a novel way. Its real genius is that it never has to win.
David Brock's 65 Project tried to get 120 Trump-aligned or election-aligned lawyers disbarred, funded by Soros, Tides, and Arabella. Jack Smith's operation gathered records on 4,700 innocent Americans — the fronts and backs of their checks, their addresses, their phone numbers, their bank accounts. The Renee Good lawsuit names Stephen Miller, Kristi Noem, Tom Homan, Christopher Rufo, Palantir, and Clearview AI. Every one of them now has to hire counsel and pay that counsel to answer a filing.
That is the mechanism. Destroy the reputation, flood the courts, and make the defense itself the sentence.
Run the same system in reverse and you get Philadelphia. More than 50 convicted murderers released under the heading of exoneration — not one based on guilt or innocence, every one on claimed procedural violations by prior prosecutors. More than three went on to commit murders or other shootings. The Pennsylvania House did impeach Larry Krasner, but under the Philadelphia Home Rule Charter there is no recall provision, so he remains in office.
Impeached — and still there. The law has not been abolished. It has been reassigned.
The Faculty Pipeline That Made It All Possible
How does a country end up with a legal system that works this way? We staffed it.
Of the roughly 100,000 students who passed through the Students for a Democratic Society and the Weather Underground, about 86 percent went into academia for life — professors at Columbia, Yale, Northwestern, Harvard, Berkeley, and NYU. Bernardine Dohrn founded the Children and Family Justice Center at Northwestern Law. Bill Ayers remains a self-described revolutionary. They bombed Congress — for real — and nobody was ever held to account.
Critical legal studies emerged formally in the 1970s out of Marxist critical theory, legal realism, and postmodern philosophy. Its central claim is that law is not neutral, not objective, and not anchored in a fixed Constitution — that it exists to preserve power and can be steered toward a preferred result. It grew inside Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Columbia, Berkeley, NYU, and Georgetown, and produced critical race theory, intersectionality, and living constitutionalism. Soros money funded many of those scholarships, and at four of those schools the track now runs separately from constitutional law.
We played the 1990 footage from Harvard Law — Professor Derrick Bell giving up a salary of more than $100,000 over faculty hiring, 500 students behind him. The student who introduced Bell to that crowd was Barack Obama. Norm Eisen was a classmate.
The harvest is on campus right now. A Gloria Steinem endowed chair at Rutgers, currently artist in residence at Harvard Medical School, spent this week publicly calling for the liberation of the accused assassin of a health insurance CEO. Ibram Kendi is back on stage telling audiences there are more of us than there are them, and that we can revolutionize this country and this world.
Thomas Sowell called it in 2008, explaining what a community organizer actually does: "He is mobilizing all the resentments, organizing them in order to put them into a battle to get what they want from other people."
The Real Objective Is Our Exhaustion — and That Is Where We Win
We played a clip today of a very powerful man stating the strategy plainly. You do not need people to believe the information, he said. You just have to flood a country's public square with enough raw sewage — raise enough questions, spread enough dirt — that citizens no longer know what to believe. Once they lose trust in their leaders, in media, in institutions, in each other, and in the possibility of truth, the game is won.
Hear what that actually says. The target is not your opinion. The target is your capacity to hold one. Hannah Arendt mapped this in The Origins of Totalitarianism — when a society believes everything and nothing at the same time, that is the moment a totalitarian regime can take a nation.
That is our addiction to conflict and chaos, manufactured and delivered to us daily. The suppliers fund the NGOs. The dealers are the captured institutions. And we are the consumers, scrolling and raging ourselves into precisely the condition the plan requires. The bourbon cannot pour itself — the addict has to participate.
Which is exactly why recovery is available right now. Our Founders rejected democracy on purpose. They called simple majority rule the shortest road to totalitarianism and gave us a Constitutional Republic instead — rights from God rather than government, and the freedom to build something without permission. G. Edward Griffin has traced how, since the 1940s, American children have been taught the opposite: that we are a democracy, 51 percent ruling 49. That single substitution is the whole game.
What is happening in France is being prepared here — same people, same money, same network, committed to the end of nation states. The technology has finally caught up with the totalitarianism, and that is why these midterms are different.
But this structure depends on what We the People control. It needs our exhaustion, our absence from the rooms where decisions get made, and our silence outside our own silo. There are perhaps 20,000 people who believe themselves elite enough to run the world. There are hundreds of millions of us.
A plan that was written can be read. A plan that is read can be refused.
Key Takeaways
- A George Soros paper dated November 1, 1993 — Toward a New World Order: The Future of NATO — became Clinton-era foreign policy, carried by John Podesta, who went on to help write Agenda 2030.
- In 2015, within a month of a Soros plan published in Project Syndicate, the United States was signed onto Agenda 2030 — a governance model built to end nation states and borders.
- At Davos on January 23, 2020, Soros named nationalism "the great enemy of open society," called out Trump and Xi, and announced $1 billion for a new university network. Within a month, COVID was here and Larry Fink of BlackRock was at the center of Agenda 2030.
- Harvard's D3P ran election simulations in 25 states and exercises in 44 more before 2020, trained 900 election officials, and built a military-style playbook and battle staff model — reportedly funded to the tune of $350 million.
- No Kings was designed before Trump returned to office; Mary McCord said so to NBC News in April 2024, and Indivisible is funded by Soros, Arabella, Tides, Rockefeller, MacArthur, and Ford.
- The 65 Project sought to disbar 120 election-aligned lawyers, and 4,700 innocent Americans had their checks, addresses, phone numbers, and bank accounts swept up — lawfare does not need a verdict, only a legal bill.
- Roughly 86 percent of the 100,000 students who passed through SDS and the Weather Underground became professors — and critical legal theory now runs as its own track at Harvard, Georgetown, NYU, and Berkeley.
Frequently Asked Questions
If all of this was published in the open, why have I never heard any of it?
Because it was published where nobody is pointed. The 1993 NATO paper, the Project Syndicate plan, the Davos transcripts, the D3P partner list — all of it is sitting in public right now. Our information system does not hide things anymore. It buries them under a daily avalanche and counts on us not digging. That is why I tell you where to look instead of what to think.
Isn't an election-security project at Harvard a good thing?
Election security is a good thing. A privately funded, military-styled operation that writes the doctrine, trains 900 officials, runs simulations in 25 states and exercises in 44 more, monitors narratives, and coordinates public response is something else — especially with a losing campaign's manager helping to lead it and the platforms as partners. Nobody voted for it, nobody can audit it, and when hearings were finally held, nothing happened.
You keep saying this is not about Trump. How, when he is in every chapter?
Because he is the obstacle, not the subject. The plan predates him by decades and will outlast him. He arrived in 2016 and said out loud at Davos that every nation state should take back its sovereignty, and that is the moment the machine turned. The question is not about one man. It is whether nation states continue to exist at all.
If both parties are compromised, why vote?
Because sitting it out is also a vote — for whatever comes next. I have no illusions about the parties and I am not convinced there really are parties. But I know what is being built on the other side, and I know the technology has caught up with the totalitarianism. Abstention is the one move that costs them nothing.
What is the most useful thing an ordinary American can do this month?
Go local and go in person. Read one primary document with your own eyes. Find out who administers elections in your county and when they meet, then show up. Have one real conversation with someone outside the silo. Knowledge breeds confidence, confidence leads to calm, and calm people are very hard to manipulate.
Watch the full episode on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v7gadkq-dc-is-a-crime-scene-are-government-gangsters-immune-from-prosecution-9-30-2.html
For my readers – Yes, we used AI to turn this episode into something readable for you. My team reviews everything first and does their best to sound like me. If it doesn't, that's fair, the robots aren't perfect…yet. If you want the real thing – unscripted, unfiltered, and exactly how I said it – that's what the full episode is for. You can always find it here [https://rumble.com/v7gadkq-dc-is-a-crime-scene-are-government-gangsters-immune-from-prosecution-9-30-2.html]