Executive Summary
The head of NATO has now admitted what many of us have been saying for years: in the autumn of 2021, Vladimir Putin sent a draft treaty asking NATO to promise no more enlargement — and NATO rejected it. On this week's Mel K Show, we traced that admission back to its roots: Secretary of State James Baker's February 9, 1990 promise to Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO would not move "one inch eastward," followed by expansion in 1999 and 2004, the 2002 U.S. exit from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, and the February 22, 2014 overthrow in Kyiv that Victoria Nuland and Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt were caught discussing on an intercepted call.
We followed the money, too. BlackRock, State Street, Lazard, PIMCO and others sat down with Zelensky in reconstruction talks moderated by Chrystia Freeland, and the World Bank, EU and UN now put the 10-year recovery plan at $587 billion. Behind all of it sits the International Organization Immunity Act of 1945, which blocks the United States from auditing the World Bank, the development banks and the UN system.
We covered Argentina's Javier Milei calling the pandemic response "social control disguised as science," the WHO's own November 2019 documents rating the evidence for lockdown measures as low or very low, and an 8–7 vote blocking immunity for a Fauci aide accused of destroying federal records.
And we came home to the real front line: seized phone and toll records of 17 sitting members of Congress plus 44 more, 600 pages of pre-indictment appellate material unsealed by the D.C. Circuit on September 23, a 6–3 Supreme Court order keeping the SAVE citizenship verification system running, and a lawfare network promising "lawsuit after lawsuit" in the 2026 midterms. The bottom line: We the People have to show up.
Scroll to the bottom for Key Takeaways.
NATO Expansion and the Broken "Not One Inch Eastward" Promise
Let's begin where the official story never does — on February 9, 1990.
That day, Secretary of State James Baker III told Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO would not move one inch eastward if the Soviets agreed to German unification. Gorbachev agreed. Jeffrey Sachs, like him or hate him, walked through what came next in about two minutes on this week's show.
In 1994, Bill Clinton signed off on a plan to expand NATO toward Ukraine. In 1999, Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic joined — and NATO bombed Belgrade, a European capital, for 78 straight days.
In 2002, the United States walked out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty — unilaterally. Missile systems went into Eastern Europe. In 2004, seven more countries joined: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia.
Not one inch? How about hundreds of miles?
The Nuland Call, the Shokin Firing, and the Ukraine We Were Never Shown
By 2010, Viktor Yanukovych had become president on a platform of neutrality. According to Sachs, most Ukrainians didn't even want to join NATO. Then, on February 22, 2014, the government was overthrown.
We know what Washington was thinking because the call was intercepted. Victoria Nuland and U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt discussed who would run the next government. Klitschko shouldn't go in — it should be Yatsenyuk. And they'd get "the big guy, Biden," to "come in and do an attaboy."
Is that how a sovereign nation picks its leaders?
Then there's Viktor Shokin — the prosecutor Joe Biden pressured Kyiv to fire once he started investigating Burisma, where Hunter Biden held a lucrative position with no background in the gas industry. Shokin now says that after 2014, every government appointment was made in agreement with Washington. He claims Ukraine was embedded with 42 bioweapons labs and 12 CIA stations.
Victoria Nuland herself bragged in 2015 about U.S.-vetted police patrolling 18 Ukrainian cities, over 60 failed banks shuttered with help from Treasury and State Department advisors, and more than $266 million poured into the security sector. I believe the total U.S. taxpayer money that has gone into Ukraine since the fall of the USSR is now well over $400 billion.
The Head of NATO's Admission
Now the man running NATO has said the quiet part out loud.
In the autumn of 2021, he says, Putin sent a draft treaty asking NATO to promise no more enlargement and to remove military infrastructure from every ally that had joined since 1997 — roughly half of NATO. "Of course, we didn't sign that," he said. "We rejected that."
He went further: Putin went to war to keep NATO off his borders, and "he has got the exact opposite" — more NATO in the east, and Finland in the alliance.
Read that again. They were offered a path to avoid this war. They declined it. And they're proud of the result.
Meanwhile, a 32-year-old Estonian, Kaja Kallas, stood at the UN reading a list of 51 countries supporting the war — out of roughly 197. That's a small minority of the world's nations. Who, exactly, is the "international community" here?
Ukraine Reconstruction: BlackRock, Freeland, Carney and the Payday
Here's where it gets even uglier. The rebuild is already being divided up.
On February 26, a group was discussing roughly 50 investment projects spanning energy, defense, technology, transport, logistics, infrastructure, steel decarbonization and housing. The participants included BlackRock, State Street, Lazard, PIMCO, Deutsche Bank and Siemens Energy — moderated by Chrystia Freeland, the same Freeland who shut off the Canadian truckers' money.
On September 10, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney — former central banker and former head of the Bank of England — announced a 100-year partnership with Ukraine linking defense co-production, private capital, critical materials, AI, cyber and digital governance. In 2019, Carney, Freeland and BlackRock CEO Larry Fink all sat on the World Economic Forum's Board of Trustees, the same year the WEF and the UN joined forces to accelerate Agenda 2030.
The World Bank, EU and UN put the 10-year reconstruction plan at $587 billion. George Soros's Open Society and the International Renaissance Foundation report up to $380 million across 21,000 projects in Ukraine since the early 2000s.
General Smedley Butler told us after World War I: war is a racket. In this model, the war destroys, and the reconstruction pays.
The International Organization Immunity Act of 1945
So why can't we just follow the money? Because of a law almost nobody has heard of.
The International Organization Immunity Act of 1945 means the United States has zero jurisdiction over the World Bank, the development banks, and the UN's 76 tentacles — including the World Health Organization and UNESCO. No audits. No lawsuits. No investigations.
I believe something like $21 trillion in U.S. taxpayer money has gone into institutions we are not allowed to examine. Meanwhile, the 47% of us who actually pay taxes get lectured about $600 billion in tax fraud.
Donald Trump could rescind this act today. I'm asking him to — publicly. Let the world see where our money went.
And there's a hopeful sign: the United States told the UN this week that it is "not allowing the global governance model" of the UN Pact for the Future or the UN Digital Compact. That's the right instinct. Now finish the job.
COVID Accountability and the Surveillance State at Home
At the UN, Javier Milei called the pandemic response "social control disguised as science." When a state takes away the right to work, to learn, and to say goodbye to our dead, he said, "there is a word for it: genocide." Argentina had been the WHO's own "star pupil" — and that's why it left.
His most important line? Emergencies pass. Fear passes. But the institutions and powers created on the pretext of those emergencies remain.
The WHO's own November 2019 pandemic planning update rated the evidence for school closures, workplace closures, mask mandates and social distancing as low or very low quality. A Johns Hopkins document from the summer of 2019 warned that officials would have an incentive to use these measures "to show that they're in charge." So why did an 8–7 vote just block immunity for a longtime Fauci aide who allegedly destroyed federal records on his behalf?
The surveillance story is just as disturbing. The phone and toll records of 17 sitting members of Congress were seized, plus 44 more — including Speaker Kevin McCarthy and House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan. But what about the tens of thousands — I believe millions — of ordinary Americans swept up from Spygate to Arctic Frost? Every one of them deserves to be notified.
Democracy Inc., the 2026 Midterms, and Why We the People Must Show Up
Here's the real front line. A new Senate "Election Protection Task Force" featuring Eric Holder, Vanita Gupta, Norm Eisen and Skye Perryman has promised "lawsuit after lawsuit at every stage of the process." Mark Elias — who has not been indicted for anything in 11 years — is gearing up to fight the new CISA 2026 election infrastructure security plan, which calls for auditable paper records and post-election manual verification.
MSNBC's leadership calls itself "team pro-democracy." But when they say democracy, they mean 51% ruling over 49%. Our Founders found pure democracy repugnant. They gave us a constitutional republic — where citizens have a representative, a voice, and a vote.
There is good news. The Supreme Court voted 6–3 to keep the SAVE citizenship verification system running. On September 23, 600 pages of pre-indictment appellate material from the sealed grand jury fights were unsealed. The record is coming out.
But none of it matters if we stay home. Demoralization is the strategy. Don't take the bait.
Key Takeaways
- NATO's chief admits Putin's autumn 2021 draft treaty asking for no more enlargement was rejected — and NATO grew anyway.
- James Baker promised Gorbachev on February 9, 1990 that NATO would not move "one inch eastward."
- The intercepted Nuland–Pyatt call chose Yatsenyuk and planned for "the big guy, Biden" to deliver an "attaboy."
- BlackRock, State Street, Lazard and PIMCO are at the Ukraine reconstruction table; the plan is priced at $587 billion.
- The International Organization Immunity Act of 1945 shields the World Bank and the UN system from U.S. audits — and can be rescinded.
- The WHO's own November 2019 documents rated evidence for lockdowns and mask mandates as low or very low.
- The Supreme Court's 6–3 order keeps SAVE citizenship verification running into the 2026 midterms.
Frequently Asked Questions
Did NATO really turn down a deal that could have prevented the Ukraine war?
According to the head of NATO himself, yes. He says Putin sent a draft treaty in autumn 2021 asking for no more NATO enlargement, and NATO rejected it. That's not our spin — that's their own admission.
Who is actually going to profit from rebuilding Ukraine?
Look at who's at the table: BlackRock, State Street, Lazard, PIMCO, Deutsche Bank and others, in talks moderated by Chrystia Freeland. The reconstruction plan is priced at $587 billion. Follow the money, and you'll see why some people don't want this war to end.
Why can't anyone audit the UN or the World Bank?
Because of the International Organization Immunity Act of 1945, which gives these institutions immunity from U.S. audits, lawsuits and investigations. A president can rescind it. We should be demanding exactly that.
Is it true the WHO knew lockdowns weren't backed by evidence?
The WHO's November 2019 pandemic planning update rated the evidence for school closures, mask mandates and social distancing as low or very low quality. They had the data. They did it anyway. That's why accountability matters.
Why should I vote in the midterms if I'm frustrated with everyone?
Because staying home is exactly what the other side is counting on. The lawfare network is already promising "lawsuit after lawsuit." This is a local fight — your county, your schools, your backyard — and We the People only win it by showing up.
Watch the full episode on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v7fz7wg-the-raging-battle-for-the-future-of-america-9-25-26.html
For my readers – Yes, we used AI to turn this episode into something readable for you. My team reviews everything first and does their best to sound like me. If it doesn't, that's fair, the robots aren't perfect…yet. If you want the real thing – unscripted, unfiltered, and exactly how I said it – that's what the full episode is for. You can always find it here [https://rumble.com/v7fz7wg-the-raging-battle-for-the-future-of-america-9-25-26.html]